| The productivity of the work force affects
Canada's competitiveness in today's global marketplace. Experts
who recently reviewed the costs and benefits of an active society
concluded that there is a fairly strong relationship between
physical activity and short-term economic impact on productivity.
They estimated a 4 to 25% increase in productivity for each
employee who was physically active.
In the early eighties, M. Cox and colleagues investigated changes
in absenteeism and turnover in a large Toronto-based insurance
company that offered a fitness program. Comparing it to a similar
company that did not offer a fitness program, they found that
the company saved $273,000 in hiring and training costs and
$88,000 in sick days — a savings of $267 per employee.
They also concluded that as a result of a 22% in reduction in
absenteeism among high program adherents and a 20% participation
rate in classes, the company's potential savings were in the
order of 1% of payroll.
A 1989 review by another Canadian researcher, Roy J. Shephard,
showed that in most studies, reduced absenteeism was related
to participation in fitness programs. In his 1992 review, 35
out of 39 studies showed significant decreases in absenteeism
for those participants with higher fitness levels.
There is a wide range in the reported reductions in absenteeism
as a result of physical activity programs at work. Decreases
vary from a low of 0.4 to a high of 3.4 days of leave per year
for program participants. However, even slight differences in
days off work could result in significant savings across the
entire workforce that is sedentary. Averaging across studies,
Shephard calculated a decrease in absenteeism of 1.6 days, or
30%, per participant per year, resulting in savings of 1.1%
of payroll costs.
"Absenteeism is a major problem for management, particularly
in production-line tasks," wrote Shephard. He reported
5 work-loss days a year in non-unionized companies and 10 in
unionized ones in 1992. He also observed that absenteeism seems
to be clustered among a relatively small proportion of workers,
with half of the absences being of brief duration and unrelated
to illness.
Just as absenteeism is mainly attributable to 20% of employees,
a large fraction of medical costs is attributable to a small
proportion of workers. Persuading these employees to exercise
may well have the greatest impact on productivity, absenteeism
and medical care costs. Moreover, offering a convenient opportunity
for employees to exercise may have the additional advantage
of attracting healthier, more productive individuals.
|